Dispute a verdict

If you believe a verdict is factually incorrect, submit a dispute below. Reader corrections and outlet right-of-reply challenges are both accepted. Every dispute is reviewed — nothing is silently dismissed.

Select dispute type:

Claim being disputed

The ratepayer protection act made sense to everybody in the house, but when it got to the Senate it was a political vote — voted against because they don't want to see the Republicans get a win

Claim page

Reader

I believe a verdict, attribution or claim wording is wrong. I am not affiliated with the outlet or the person quoted.

Outlet

I represent the outlet whose article the claim comes from.

Person quoted

I am, or represent, the person the claim is attributed to.

Your dispute *

Be specific. Include links to authoritative sources where possible.

Your email address *

We will respond to this address. Not published.

Our process: A person reviews each dispute against the published methodology. We aim to respond within 10 business days. If a dispute is upheld, the claim is re-checked or corrected, and its page shows a correction note. Dispute submissions and your contact details are not published. Read the full policy.