Coverage

Live Feed

What was claimed, and what we found. Not everything that was said — what has been through the process.

Last claim checked October 7 FEEDRSSJSON

Every verdict follows our published methodology — how we check claims.

There is no filter by person. A page narrowed to one individual is a claim history about that individual, and we do not build those.

No events listed
The publication's own words
Reported from somebody else
Said at an event
6 October
10:44 pm

I don't believe we're gonna need a ICE presence in the state of Michigan because we are going to be enforcing the law.

Opinion

John James, at Michigan Governor General Election Debate (WOOD TV8)

10:44 pm
Why this verdict View evidenceHide evidence
Why we checked itJames asserts that state-level law enforcement would be sufficient to eliminate the need for ICE presence in Michigan — a specific policy claim about immigration enforcement capacity that can be evaluated against current ICE activity and Michigan's enforcement record.
What we foundThe claim is an expression of James's belief and policy intention about future governance, not a verifiable factual assertion.
Claim page Dispute this claim