Coverage

Live Feed

What was claimed, and what we found. Not everything that was said — what has been through the process.

Last claim checked 7 hours ago FEEDRSSJSON

Every verdict follows our published methodology — how we check claims.

There is no filter by person. A page narrowed to one individual is a claim history about that individual, and we do not build those.

No events listed
The publication's own words
Reported from somebody else
Said at an event
Yesterday
7 hr

He's got a direct line to the president who's making sure the war does not end, and he's not using it because he's true led this war the entire time.

Disputed

Abdul El-Sayed, at Michigan U.S. Senate General Election Debate 1 (WOOD TV8)

7 hr
Why this verdict View evidenceHide evidence
Why we checked itAsserts his opponent has a direct line to the president and has 'led this war the entire time' — a specific accusation about his opponent's actions and relationships that could be evaluated against the record.
What we foundWhile Rogers does have a close relationship with Trump and initially supported the Iran war, multiple credible outlets directly contradict El-Sayed's claim that Rogers is 'not using' that line or has uniformly 'led this war the entire time' — Rogers has publicly broken with Trump and called for the war to end quickly.
Claim page Dispute this claim