Coverage

Live Feed

What was claimed, and what we found. Not everything that was said — what has been through the process.

Last claim checked 6 hours ago FEEDRSSJSON

Every verdict follows our published methodology — how we check claims.

There is no filter by person. A page narrowed to one individual is a claim history about that individual, and we do not build those.

No events listed
The publication's own words
Reported from somebody else
Said at an event
Yesterday
6 hr

The question of genocide is a question of whether a government has the specific intent to destroy a national or ethnic group. And that is a question for the International Criminal Court.

Overstated

Jon Ossoff, at Georgia U.S. Senate General Election Debate 1 (Atlanta News First)

6 hr
Why this verdict View evidenceHide evidence
Why we checked itOssoff asserts that genocide determinations fall under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court — this is a specific legal claim that can be checked against international law and ICC jurisdiction (which actually covers genocide under the Rome Statute, but the definition framing is also verifiable).
What we foundThe genocide definition (specific intent to destroy a national or ethnic group) is accurate under international law, but attributing genocide determination to the ICC specifically is misleading — the ICC prosecutes individuals, not governments; state-level genocide responsibility is adjudicated by the ICJ.
Claim page Dispute this claim