Coverage

Live Feed

What was claimed, and what we found. Not everything that was said — what has been through the process.

Last claim checked October 11 FEEDRSSJSON

Every verdict follows our published methodology — how we check claims.

There is no filter by person. A page narrowed to one individual is a claim history about that individual, and we do not build those.

No events listed
The publication's own words
Reported from somebody else
Said at an event
11 October
5:56 pm

neither the major parties wants to [do something about immigration] because then they wouldn't be able to campaign on it and fundraise on it

Opinion

Kasie Whitener, at South Carolina U.S. Senate General Election Debate (SCETV)

5:56 pm
Why this verdict View evidenceHide evidence
Why we checked itThis is a specific causal assertion that both major parties are deliberately avoiding immigration reform to preserve it as a campaign and fundraising issue — a claim about political motivation that could be examined against legislative records and party behavior
What we foundThe claim is a causal inference about the intentions of both major parties — asserting they deliberately avoid solving immigration to preserve it as a campaign and fundraising asset — which is a normative/motivational judgment that cannot be empirically verified as true or false.
Claim page Dispute this claim