Coverage

Live Feed

What was claimed, and what we found. Not everything that was said — what has been through the process.

Last claim checked October 27 FEEDRSSJSON

Every verdict follows our published methodology — how we check claims.

There is no filter by person. A page narrowed to one individual is a claim history about that individual, and we do not build those.

No events listed
The publication's own words
Reported from somebody else
Said at an event
26 October
8:03 pm

The Supreme Court seems determined to support the broad powers that President Trump has given himself

Overstated

John Hickenlooper, at Colorado U.S. Senate General Election Debate (Colorado Sun)

8:03 pm
Why this verdict View evidenceHide evidence
Why we checked itThis asserts a specific claim about the Supreme Court's posture toward executive power expansion under Trump, which is a verifiable pattern of rulings and decisions that can be checked against court record
What we foundThe Supreme Court has substantially supported expanded presidential executive authority in the 2025–26 term, but it also issued significant rulings against Trump on tariffs, birthright citizenship, and the Federal Reserve, making the claim that it 'seems determined to support' Trump's broad powers an overstatement of a more mixed record.
Claim page Dispute this claim