Coverage

Live Feed

What was claimed, and what we found. Not everything that was said — what has been through the process.

Last claim checked October 27 FEEDRSSJSON

Every verdict follows our published methodology — how we check claims.

There is no filter by person. A page narrowed to one individual is a claim history about that individual, and we do not build those.

No events listed
The publication's own words
Reported from somebody else
Said at an event
26 October
8:03 pm

The word 'filibuster' does not appear in the United States Constitution

Supported

Mark Baisley, at Colorado U.S. Senate General Election Debate (Colorado Sun)

8:03 pm
Why this verdict View evidenceHide evidence
Why we checked itBaisley asserts the word 'filibuster' yields zero hits in the Constitution, using this as the basis for his policy argument. This is a specific, verifiable textual claim about the Constitution's content.
What we foundThe word 'filibuster' does not appear anywhere in the United States Constitution, confirmed by multiple independent authoritative sources.
Claim page Dispute this claim