Coverage

Live Feed

What was claimed, and what we found. Not everything that was said — what has been through the process.

Last claim checked October 30 FEEDRSSJSON

Every verdict follows our published methodology — how we check claims.

There is no filter by person. A page narrowed to one individual is a claim history about that individual, and we do not build those.

No events listed
The publication's own words
Reported from somebody else
Said at an event
29 October
7:48 pm

the Supreme Court has been stacked with political hacks to specifically overturn the education funding decisions

Opinion

Cinde Warmington, at New Hampshire Governor General Election Debate (WMUR)

7:48 pm
Why this verdict View evidenceHide evidence
Why we checked itWarmington claims the New Hampshire Supreme Court was deliberately packed with politically motivated justices for the purpose of overturning specific education funding rulings — a serious allegation about judicial appointments that is verifiable against appointment records and timelines.
What we foundThe claim is an opinion because it attributes a specific motive ('specifically to overturn the education funding decisions') to the judicial appointments, which is an inference about intent that cannot be verified as a factual matter.
Claim page Dispute this claim